Seems this Time cover is causing an uproar in the United States. What else is new? The over-moral folks are clamoring to the rights over what people do with their bodies. Now, personally, I think it’s a bit weird for some kid who is the size of a midget to be sucking his model-like mom’s titty like it’s a walk in the park. The image is usually some little baby grabbing some nipple-juice to help him grow.
Either this woman is taking steroids and passing it to her offspring or that kid’s father has some Captain America super-soldier serum coursing through his veins. Either way, people at the check-out line are going to sexualize the image, covering their children’s eyes because obviously viewing a breast at an early age (after breastfeeding of course, but before dating) will cause you to rape, murder, and pillage the nearest orphanage.
I think the photo is actually cool and I wouldn’t mind a dip in mom’s pool but is the photo appropriate for TIME magazine? Sure. Nothing really controversial in it for me. The only thing weird is the kid looks like he’s older than 3, can fight, and obviously likes combat with his camo slacks. He’s half his hot mom’s height and weight and seems to have a magical ability to seek out the nearest leaking titty and attack!
In Europe, this photo wouldn’t have made a blip on the radar in the weekly church periodical. But here in the archaic, tyrannical United States where breast-sightings have been known to have Medusa-like effects on penises and cause the men they’re attached to to have Reefer-Madness-like reactions where civilization is reduced to mindless zombies on the search for the nearest wet opening….wait. What was I talking about?
Oh yeah… This isn’t controversial. Move on and hopefully when the kid is 9 years old, doesn’t decide to crave milk with his pizza. At that point…yeah. It just might be a tad bit controversial.